Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Back soon to help #5

Open
UkooLabs opened this issue May 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Back soon to help #5

UkooLabs opened this issue May 27, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@UkooLabs
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like as fate would have it im in need of dds encoding primarily for xpr0 decoding. And started to write my own decoders from scratch, realizing I'm being stupid I could continue by adding in any missing code to this project. So expect PRs coming soon. I would like to Private message someone but not sure how to, it's a shame you have not got a discord server yet :). What is currently missing as the highest priority?

@brianpopow
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @UkooLabs,

nice to hear from you again! We do not have have a gitter chat channel anymore or discord, but you can find my email in my github profile, if you want to send me private messages.
I would prefer, if we could keep discussions public though, so others can participate and give their opinions.

I tried to continue your work, but it's really a lot to do and for a single person it seems too much to handle.
I mean we already have support for decoding good amount of texture formats and many pixel types and compressions, but there are still alot of things todo.

The main things for me are:

  • Basic support of encoding textures. Currently we do not support encoding at all. Maybe in a first step only encoding of uncompressed and only one kind of textures (ktx, maybe)?
  • Better unit tests. All the different pixel formats need tests. We need to compare our results to a reference decoder. This will be a painful chore.
    I was thinking of trying out ImageMagick for that,
    as we do in the main ImageSharp project. ImageMagick should support decoding textures i think, but i have not tried that yes. If that does not work out,
    we need to compare our results to reference output, which means we need to provide reference output for all texture format / pixel formats / mipmap's (that's alot).
  • The maybe biggest issue I see: I think we need some real life application, which uses the ImageSharp.Textures package. We need some feedback, if everything works
    out as expected and is ok to use as it is. I am interested in the field of computer game development, but I am definitely not an expert in that specific field.

regards,
Brian

@JimBobSquarePants
Copy link
Member

I think we need to do a thorough review of the architecture of the library before continuing with a massive focus on cleanup over features.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants