We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi there 👋
I'm not sure if this is important for thinc, but I'll mention just in case. Feel free to close it. 😅
Pydantic published a security vulnerability yesterday, which you can check it here.
The way that was handled on FastAPI is to not allow versions that are different from the ones with the security patch, as you can see here.
I guess this is relevant as we don't want to allow a Pydantic version with this security vulnerability as requirement. 😗
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Hi there 👋
I'm not sure if this is important for thinc, but I'll mention just in case. Feel free to close it. 😅
Pydantic published a security vulnerability yesterday, which you can check it here.
The way that was handled on FastAPI is to not allow versions that are different from the ones with the security patch, as you can see here.
I guess this is relevant as we don't want to allow a Pydantic version with this security vulnerability as requirement. 😗
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: