You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running: npm --engine-strict=false install --offline
npm info using npm@10.5.0
npm info using node@v20.12.2
npm ERR! code ENOTCACHED
npm ERR! request to https://registry.npmjs.org/fs-extra failed: cache mode is 'only-if-cached' but no cached response is available.
Note that flatpak-node-generator generates the same generated-sources.json when running under node 18 and 20, so there shouldn't be an issue with that.
Does node20 / npm10 use a different cache lookup logic than node18 / npm9?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
flatpak-builder version
1.4.2
Linux distribution and version
Arch Linux x64
Affected flatpak-builder tool
node/flatpak-node-generator.py
flatpak-builder tool cli args
--force-clean --ccache --repo=$REPO --state-dir=$STATE --default-branch=master build $MANIFEST
Source repository URL
No response
Flatpak-builder manifest URL
No response
Description
The Threema 2.0 for Desktop project (not yet open sourced, will be soon-ish) currently uses node 18 / npm 9:
Manifest File
This works without any issues. However, if I switch to the node20 image containing npm 10:
...the build fails:
Note that flatpak-node-generator generates the same
generated-sources.json
when running under node 18 and 20, so there shouldn't be an issue with that.Does node20 / npm10 use a different cache lookup logic than node18 / npm9?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: