diff --git a/test/known_problems/should_pass/poly_should_pass.erl b/test/known_problems/should_pass/poly_should_pass.erl
index 05a685b5..b40a313e 100644
--- a/test/known_problems/should_pass/poly_should_pass.erl
+++ b/test/known_problems/should_pass/poly_should_pass.erl
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 
 -gradualizer([solve_constraints]).
 
--export([find1/0]).
+-export([find1/0,
+         l/0]).
 
 -spec lookup(T1, [{T1, T2}]) -> (none | T2).
 lookup(_, []) -> none;
@@ -15,3 +16,41 @@ find1() ->
         none -> "default";
         V -> V
     end.
+
+-type t1() :: {}.
+-type t2() :: binary().
+-type list_of_unions() :: [t1() | t2()].
+
+%% This fails with:
+%%
+%%   Lower bound [t1() | t2()] of type variable B_typechecker_3529_12 on line 25
+%%   is not a subtype of t1() | t2()
+%%
+%% Now, why is that the case?
+%% `return_list_of_unions/1' returns just that - a list of `t1() | t2()' unions.
+%% This means that `has_intersection_spec/1' passed in to `lists:map/2' would be called with
+%% a union as the arg, not a list.
+%% This should mean that it would also return a `t1() | t2()' union, so the final return value from
+%% `l/0' should be `[t1() | t2()]'.
+%% However, the constraint solver is not able to tell that only one clause of the
+%% multi-clause spec would suffice and it uses both clauses' return types as lower bound on `B'.
+%%
+%% In practice, this means that we should avoid functions
+%% with intersection types like `(a()) -> b() & ([a()]) -> [b()]',
+%% because the constraint solver can't cope with them.
+%% We should instead define two separate functions: `(a()) -> b()' and `([a()]) -> [b()]',
+%% and check outside of them which to call based on the type of the parameter.
+%%
+%% See also `l/0' in `test/should_pass/poly_pass.erl'.
+-spec l() -> [t1() | t2()].
+l() ->
+    lists:map(fun has_intersection_spec/1, return_list_of_unions([])).
+
+-spec has_intersection_spec(t1() | t2()) -> t1() | t2();
+                           (list()) -> [t1() | t2()].
+has_intersection_spec([]) -> [];
+has_intersection_spec([_|_] = L) -> lists:map(fun has_intersection_spec/1, L);
+has_intersection_spec(T) -> T.
+
+-spec return_list_of_unions(list_of_unions()) -> list_of_unions().
+return_list_of_unions(_L) -> [].
diff --git a/test/should_fail/poly_union_lower_bound_fail.erl b/test/should_fail/poly_union_lower_bound_fail.erl
index 73c974f8..9f065580 100644
--- a/test/should_fail/poly_union_lower_bound_fail.erl
+++ b/test/should_fail/poly_union_lower_bound_fail.erl
@@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ takes_a_union(I) when is_integer(I) -> I.
 %%   on line 456 is not a subtype of binary() | integer()
 -spec k([binary() | integer() | string()]) -> list().
 k(L) ->
-    lists:map(fun takes_an_intersection/1, L).
+    lists:map(fun has_intersection_spec/1, L).
 
--spec takes_an_intersection(binary()) -> binary();
+-spec has_intersection_spec(binary()) -> binary();
                            (integer()) -> integer().
-takes_an_intersection(B) when is_binary(B) -> B;
-takes_an_intersection(I) when is_integer(I) -> I.
+has_intersection_spec(B) when is_binary(B) -> B;
+has_intersection_spec(I) when is_integer(I) -> I.
 
 -spec l([binary() | integer()]) -> [integer()].
 l(L) ->
-    lists:map(fun takes_an_intersection/1, L).
+    lists:map(fun has_intersection_spec/1, L).
diff --git a/test/should_pass/poly_lists_map_constraints_pass.erl b/test/should_pass/poly_lists_map_constraints_pass.erl
index 08b5d6f5..c3752010 100644
--- a/test/should_pass/poly_lists_map_constraints_pass.erl
+++ b/test/should_pass/poly_lists_map_constraints_pass.erl
@@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ map_specific_list(List) ->
 
 -spec j([binary() | integer()]) -> list().
 j(L) ->
-    lists:map(fun takes_an_intersection/1, L).
+    lists:map(fun has_intersection_spec/1, L).
 
--spec takes_an_intersection(binary()) -> binary();
+-spec has_intersection_spec(binary()) -> binary();
                            (integer()) -> integer().
-takes_an_intersection(B) when is_binary(B) -> B;
-takes_an_intersection(I) when is_integer(I) -> I.
+has_intersection_spec(B) when is_binary(B) -> B;
+has_intersection_spec(I) when is_integer(I) -> I.
diff --git a/test/should_pass/poly_pass.erl b/test/should_pass/poly_pass.erl
index dcf99940..c357f726 100644
--- a/test/should_pass/poly_pass.erl
+++ b/test/should_pass/poly_pass.erl
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
          poly_pass/3]).
 
 %% These examples don't come from the above paper.
--export([f/1]).
+-export([f/1,
+         l/0]).
 
 -gradualizer([solve_constraints]).
 
@@ -18,3 +19,17 @@ poly_pass(F, B1, B2) -> {F(B2), F(B1)}.
 -spec f([integer(), ...]) -> integer().
 f(L) ->
     hd(L).
+
+-type t1() :: {}.
+-type t2() :: binary().
+-type list_of_unions() :: [t1() | t2()].
+
+-spec l() -> [t1() | t2()].
+l() ->
+    lists:map(fun helper/1, return_list_of_unions([])).
+
+-spec helper(t1() | t2()) -> t1() | t2().
+helper(T) -> T.
+
+-spec return_list_of_unions(list_of_unions()) -> list_of_unions().
+return_list_of_unions(_L) -> [].