Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Search is a pain to remember the attempts and delays #6

Open
z1pti3 opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Search is a pain to remember the attempts and delays #6

z1pti3 opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@z1pti3
Copy link
Owner

z1pti3 commented Nov 24, 2021

I also noticed how much of a pain playbook is now you have to keep defining these on the search actions as well as the start action - we need to find a nicer more user friendly way to do this. I expect we need to include it in the playbook data and then when you change the values it does a mass update on the database for all existing playbook entries by x name

image

@z1pti3
Copy link
Owner Author

z1pti3 commented Nov 25, 2021

Why dont we have an option to load from an existing object?

@b1scuit-thi3f
Copy link
Collaborator

That would make sense, so it loads the maxAttempts and delayBetweenAttempts from the object instead? I guess we'd have to let it poll the object when it runs in the flow to maybe make sure the values were still accurate?

@z1pti3
Copy link
Owner Author

z1pti3 commented Nov 27, 2021

If we poll it as part of the init loading then jimi will cache the value until he rebuilds the trigger which by default is every 60 seconds.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants