v7.4.5 #2618
Merged
v7.4.5 #2618
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Hide step 2 if the user has no escrowed entries * Update the banner link
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2618 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 50.71% 50.74% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 378 378
Lines 11399 11399
Branches 2692 2692
==========================================
+ Hits 5781 5784 +3
+ Misses 5396 5393 -3
Partials 222 222
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
koredefashokun
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hide step 2 if the user has no escrowed entries
Update the banner link
Description
Related issue
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):