Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mitmproxy: 10.4.2 -> 11.0.0 #347259

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

aaronjheng
Copy link
Contributor

@aaronjheng aaronjheng commented Oct 8, 2024

https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy/releases/tag/v11.0.0

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@aaronjheng aaronjheng marked this pull request as draft October 8, 2024 09:08
@aaronjheng aaronjheng force-pushed the mitmproxy branch 2 times, most recently from 528586b to ed328b2 Compare October 8, 2024 09:32
@@ -33,6 +30,5 @@ buildPythonPackage rec {
license = licenses.mit;
maintainers = with maintainers; [ boltzmannrain ];
platforms = platforms.darwin;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should set sourceProvenenance accordingly

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants