-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add datadog span processor. #6092
base: bnjjj/more_telemetry_tests
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
CI performance tests
|
56bacac
to
3a60672
Compare
Move the datadog agent processor out to separate files.
3a60672
to
6b198cb
Compare
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ async fn test_otlp_request_with_zipkin_trace_context_propagator_with_datadog( | |||
.await?; | |||
// ---------------------- | |||
// Testing for a trace containing a tracestate m and psr with psr set to 1 for DD and an unsampled trace, so it should be sent to the otlp exporter with sampling priority set to 1 | |||
// But it should send the trace to subgraph as the tracestate contains a psr set to 1 | |||
// It should not send the trace to the subgraph as we didn't use the datadog propagator and therefore the trace will remain unsampled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bnjjj This is a key test change. As we're not using datadog propagation I don't think the subgraph should pick up the trace.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we sure we should not take care of this tracestate ? Do we have any specs or docs to help us to choose ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// The propagator gets first dibs on setting the trace state, so if it sets it, we don't override it unless we are not parent based. | ||
match result.decision { | ||
SamplingDecision::Drop | SamplingDecision::RecordOnly => { | ||
result.decision = SamplingDecision::RecordOnly; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bnjjj This is the only change to the logic
} | ||
|
||
fn on_end(&self, mut span: SpanData) { | ||
let new_trace_flags = span.span_context.trace_flags().with_sampled(true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we check for either sampling priority to be set or measured to be set to set it to true ? I know for now we don't have that case but should we already try to handle this ?
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ async fn test_otlp_request_with_zipkin_trace_context_propagator_with_datadog( | |||
.await?; | |||
// ---------------------- | |||
// Testing for a trace containing a tracestate m and psr with psr set to 1 for DD and an unsampled trace, so it should be sent to the otlp exporter with sampling priority set to 1 | |||
// But it should send the trace to subgraph as the tracestate contains a psr set to 1 | |||
// It should not send the trace to the subgraph as we didn't use the datadog propagator and therefore the trace will remain unsampled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we sure we should not take care of this tracestate ? Do we have any specs or docs to help us to choose ?
This PR makes the datadog agent sampling feature use Record rather than RecordAndSample for spans that would otherwise have been dropped.
This allows us to stay closer to the original telemetry logic for setting the sampled trace flag.
This complexity arrises because BatchSPanProcessors usually drop spans that are not sampled.
To get around this we introduce a wrapper that is active for otlp and datadog exporters if agent sampling is enabled that updates the spandata to say that it was sampled.
Checklist
Complete the checklist (and note appropriate exceptions) before the PR is marked ready-for-review.
Exceptions
Note any exceptions here
Notes
Footnotes
It may be appropriate to bring upcoming changes to the attention of other (impacted) groups. Please endeavour to do this before seeking PR approval. The mechanism for doing this will vary considerably, so use your judgement as to how and when to do this. ↩
Configuration is an important part of many changes. Where applicable please try to document configuration examples. ↩
Tick whichever testing boxes are applicable. If you are adding Manual Tests, please document the manual testing (extensively) in the Exceptions. ↩