CIP-0124? | Extend token metadata for translations

[granada-pool]

This proposal defines an additional property to the NFT and FT metadata standard to support text localization.

---

(rendered proposal in branch)

[rphair]

Please rename your project folder from CIP-1856 to something else beginning with CIP- but not a number (derived from your proposal name, or ????). This is relatively important for 1856 because we had a potential CIP-1856 for a while: #104

[rphair]

Thanks @granada-pool for the latest updates & including the peer review from NMKR. Can you please rename the project folder from CIP-1856 to something without a number it it (e.g. CIP-????, CIP-XXXX, CIP-token-metadata-translations)?

[rphair]

@Padierfind if you could please assist here:

• This proposal seems good enough for me to approve (mainly based on web standards experience; I'm not a token metadata expert) if we could have a peer review, or even just an acknowledgement, of this PR coming from the NMKR direction.
• If there are any revisions to how your peer review is presented in the CIP please suggest alternative language and/or discuss it in this PR.

[rphair]

@granada-pool this was generally seen at tonight's CIP meeting to be ready to progress to the final Last Check stage before merge as soon as @Ryun1's feedback above is addressed. (The CDDL spec is a rather big thing that it needs first.)

Please also change the containing directory name to CIP-0124 🎉

[rphair]

@granada-pool are you still advocating this? Based on no response to the 2 reviews above it appears abandoned & so we're tagging at such (it's not really Waiting for Author since the proposal specification was well received in review except for some document particulars, as recorded above).

It would seem a shame to close this PR after you have basically done all the work, so please respond to the feedback above if & when you can. (Proposals marked as apparently "Abandoned" will be closed some time afterward if no further progress is made.)

[granada-pool]

@granada-pool this was generally seen at tonight's CIP meeting to be ready to progress to the final Last Check stage before merge as soon as @Ryun1's feedback above is addressed. (The CDDL spec is a rather big thing that it needs first.)

Please also change the containing directory name to CIP-0124 🎉

@rphair Great to know! I just made some changes based on your comments and suggestions

[granada-pool]

@granada-pool are you still advocating this? Based on no response to the 2 reviews above it appears abandoned & so we're tagging at such (it's not really Waiting for Author since the proposal specification was well received in review except for some document particulars, as recorded above).

It would seem a shame to close this PR after you have basically done all the work, so please respond to the feedback above if & when you can. (Proposals marked as apparently "Abandoned" will be closed some time afterward if no further progress is made.)

@rphair Absolutely! I apologize for the delay, I had quite a lot on my plate with the development of VAULT3 and the RareEvo event. Hope the changes made today satisfy all reviews. Please tag me if there are more improvements to make.

[rphair]

thanks @granada-pool - just one last pass for me before we try to push this through:

[rphair]

(accidentally hit "Submit" button above)

[rphair]

@granada-pool I think we are all in order now although I will leave it to @Ryun1 @Crypto2099 to confirm the CDDL spec + recent updates. Marking as Last Check since I think this is now good to finally merge as soon as we have their confirmation.