Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev/core#292 Fix issue where accented characters were not properly ut… #225

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2018

Conversation

seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor

…f8 encoded which then broke the json_encoding

ping @eileenmcnaughton @francescbassas

Local Testing suggests this will work, i'm not sure why its not already properly utf8.

…f8 encoded which then broke the json_encoding
@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Aug 3, 2018

(Standard links)

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @seamuslee001 great work. @francescbassas does this work for you?

@seamuslee001 I think we should merge to 5.5 & possibly backport to 5.4

@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eileenmcnaughton did you see my comments on the backstory to this one. Also ping @agileware-fj Francis, this relates to a fix you did for AUG i think where by \s were causing issues in the javascript in one part.

@francescbassas
Copy link

I can confirm that this works for me! Thanks @seamuslee001 and @eileenmcnaughton.

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

@seamuslee001 if you do against the rc I'll merge. That way we can put a patch version out if we do decide it was a 5.3.2 regression & there is not really a downside

@seamuslee001 seamuslee001 changed the base branch from master to 5.5 August 5, 2018 08:25
@seamuslee001
Copy link
Contributor Author

@eileenmcnaughton i have put this now against the 5.5 branch which is the RC now. I guess question is do we want to do a 5.4.1 release

@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton merged commit e4e7997 into civicrm:5.5 Aug 5, 2018
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @seamuslee001 - merged - I think we likely should - if we agree it was a 5.3.2 regression - but perhaps not rush it out in case something else emerges in the next few days? Should we merge a PR to 5.4 so it's there is we do cut one?

(will up-merge now)

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

ok - we are still playing whackamole here - new breakage https://lab.civicrm.org/dev/core/issues/508

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants