Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(torii): remove unused parameters #2360

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2024
Merged

chore(torii): remove unused parameters #2360

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2024

Conversation

lambda-0x
Copy link
Collaborator

@lambda-0x lambda-0x commented Aug 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved code clarity by removing unnecessary commented-out references in transaction processing methods, enhancing overall readability without affecting functionality.

commit-id:46e98ebc
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! The changes involve the cleanup of the Engine<P> implementation in the engine.rs file, specifically focusing on transaction processing methods. Commented-out references to the transaction parameter have been removed from the process_transaction_with_receipt and process_transaction_with_events methods. The core functionality and logic of these methods remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
crates/torii/core/src/engine.rs Removed commented-out transaction parameter from process_transaction_with_events and process_transaction_with_receipt methods.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Engine
    participant Transaction
    participant Events

    Engine->>Transaction: process_transaction_with_events(transaction_hash, events, block_number, block_timestamp)
    Transaction-->>Engine: Processed events

    Engine->>Transaction: process_transaction_with_receipt(transaction_hash, block_number, block_timestamp)
    Transaction-->>Engine: Processed receipt
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2fb8ce and 3fb2fb4.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • crates/torii/core/src/engine.rs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • crates/torii/core/src/engine.rs

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lambda-0x lambda-0x changed the title remove unused parameters chore(torii): remove unused parameters Aug 29, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.50%. Comparing base (a2fb8ce) to head (3fb2fb4).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2360   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.50%   67.50%           
=======================================
  Files         359      359           
  Lines       46979    46975    -4     
=======================================
- Hits        31712    31710    -2     
+ Misses      15267    15265    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glihm glihm merged commit 4556a35 into main Aug 30, 2024
15 checks passed
@glihm glihm deleted the spr/main/46e98ebc branch August 30, 2024 02:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants