Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prepare release: v1.0.0-alpha.10 #2399

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

Prepare release: v1.0.0-alpha.10 #2399

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

tarrencev
Copy link
Contributor

@tarrencev tarrencev commented Sep 8, 2024

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated versioning for the software and runner-macro package, indicating potential new features and improvements in the alpha stage.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 8, 2024

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! This pull request introduces a minor version update for two Cargo.toml files in a Rust project. Both files change the version from "1.0.0-alpha.9" to "1.0.0-alpha.10". This update signifies a continuation in the development of the project and the runner-macro package, while maintaining the existing configurations and dependencies without any other modifications.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Cargo.toml, crates/katana/runner/runner-macro/Cargo.toml Updated version from "1.0.0-alpha.9" to "1.0.0-alpha.10"

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Application
    participant RunnerMacro

    User->>Application: Request feature
    Application->>RunnerMacro: Process request
    RunnerMacro-->>Application: Return result
    Application-->>User: Deliver result
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76458a3 and 5843c50.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (2)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • crates/katana/runner/runner-macro/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • Cargo.toml
  • crates/katana/runner/runner-macro/Cargo.toml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.15%. Comparing base (76458a3) to head (5843c50).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2399   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.15%   68.15%           
=======================================
  Files         364      364           
  Lines       47712    47712           
=======================================
  Hits        32516    32516           
  Misses      15196    15196           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glihm glihm merged commit f105912 into main Sep 9, 2024
15 checks passed
@glihm glihm deleted the prepare-release branch September 9, 2024 00:04
@kariy kariy mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants