Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version 2.X #155

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 19, 2023
Merged

Version 2.X #155

merged 5 commits into from
Nov 19, 2023

Conversation

jaswdr
Copy link
Owner

@jaswdr jaswdr commented Oct 10, 2023

Description

This PR creates v2.0.0. The main goal of this version is to remove support for unmaintained versions of Go (aka.: < 1.20). Requiring 1.20 as the minimum version also unblock us to use the latest features of the language, like generics which will heavily help in the removal of duplicated code. Other changes also include:

  1. [WIP] Fix fill of inner structs #136 fixes the fill of inner structs, not requiring the manual use of "skip"
  2. Remove deprecated crypto methods from Revert changes done to crypto to make it less random #154
  3. Refactoring of common methods in faker.go

more to be added...

Additionally, I'm adding a proposal to follow Go's Release Policy and only support the latest 2 major versions, which by the time of this writing is 1.20 and 1.21.

Are you trying to fix an existing issue?

Require Go >= 1.20 to use latest language features.

Go Version

N/A

Go Tests

N/A

@jaswdr jaswdr merged commit 48d2fba into master Nov 19, 2023
23 checks passed
@jaswdr jaswdr deleted the v2 branch November 19, 2023 14:05
@RenatoLopes771
Copy link

Additionally, I'm adding a proposal to follow Go's Release Policy and only support the latest 2 major versions, which by the time of this writing is 1.20 and 1.21.

I suggest every release include the supported versions

I'm reading the changelogs and I can't find any breaking changes between v1 and v2. So is it safe to upgrade?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants