Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add FindDeepestTagsWithFilter*() functions #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2023

Conversation

vincentbernat
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 23, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3111720990

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 81.215%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2834590035: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 147
Relevant Lines: 181

💛 - Coveralls


// FindDeepestTagsWithFilterAppend finds all tags at the deepest level in the tree, matching the provided filter, representing the closest match
// - appends results to the input slice
// - returns true regardless of the result of the filtering function

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this comment (and corresponding callers) is actually slightly misleading because this can return false if the tree is empty. since this is the only scenario that can happen and this review is long overdue, I think it's fine to fix as part of a later commit/fix

@aaronfuj aaronfuj merged commit 2e9139d into kentik:main Oct 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants