DynComms [4/n]: Implement Dynamic Commitments Negotiation #8756
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
18 tasks
ProofOfKeags
force-pushed
the
feature/dyncomm-negotiator
branch
from
9203c9b
to
ae3abc2
Compare
ProofOfKeags
force-pushed
the
feature/dyncomm-negotiator
branch
from
ae3abc2
to
1dd6845
Compare
ProofOfKeags
force-pushed
the
feature/dyncomm-negotiator
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7fa0f9d
to
9a13916
Compare
ProofOfKeags
added
dynamic commitments
incomplete
ProofOfKeags
changed the title
ProofOfKeags
force-pushed
the
feature/dyncomm-negotiator
branch
3 times, most recently
from
a980df9
to
4570813
Compare
The purpose of this commit is to begin the process of packing symmetric fields into the newly introduced Dual structure. The reason for this is that the Dual structure has a handy indexing method where we can supply a ChannelParty and get back a value. This will cut down on the amount of branching code in the main lines of the codebase logic, making it easier to follow what is going on.
This commit begins the process of moving towards a more principled means of state tracking. We eliminate the mutateState argument from processAddEntry and processRemoveEntry and move the responsibility of mutating said state to the call-sites. The current call-sites of these functions still have their *own* mutateState argument which will be eliminated during upcoming commits. However, following the principle of micro-commits I opted to break these changes up to make review simpler.
This commit redoes the API and semantics of processFeeUpdate to make it consistent with the semantics of it's sister functions. This is part of an ongoing series of commits to remove mutateState arguments pervasively from the codebase. As with the previous commit this makes state mutation the caller's responsibility. This temporarily increases code duplication at the call-sites, but this will unlock other refactor opportunities.
In this commit we observe that the previous commit reduced the role of this function to a single assignment statement with numerous newly irrelevant parameters. This commit makes the choice of inlining it at the two call-sites within evaluateHTLCView and removing the funciton definition entirely. This also allows us to drop a huge portion of newly irrelevant test code.
This commit makes the observation that the nextHeight parameter of these two functions is no longer used by those funcitons themselves as a result of extracting the state mutation to the call-sites. This removes the parameter entirely.
In line with previous commits we are progressively removing the mutateState argument from this call stack for a more principled software design approach. NOTE FOR REVIEWERS: We take a naive approach to updating the tests here and simply take the functionality we are removing from evaluateHTLCView and run it directly after the function in the test suite. It's possible that we should instead remove this from the test suite altogether but I opted to take a more conservative approach with respect to reducing the scope of tests. If you have opinions here, please make them known.
This commit removes another raw boolean value and replaces it with a more clear type/name. This will also assist us when we later try and consolidate the logic of evaluateHTLCView into a single coherent computation.
This commit moves the collection of updates behind a Dual structure. This allows us in a later commit to index into it via a ChannelParty parameter which will simplify the loops in evaluateHTLCView.
ProofOfKeags
force-pushed
the
feature/dyncomm-negotiator
branch
from
4570813
to
48a377a
Compare
This commit simplifies how we compute the commitment fee rate based off of the live updates. Prior to this commit we processed all of the FeeUpdate paymentDescriptors of both ChannelParty's. Now we only process the last FeeUpdate of the OpeningParty
We had four for-loops in evaluateHTLCView that were exact mirror images of each other. By making use of the new ChannelParty and Dual facilities introduced in prior commits, we consolidate these into two for-loops.
This further reduces loop complexity in evaluateHTLCView by using explicit filter steps rather than loop continue statements.
This commit observes that processAddEntry and processRemoveEntry are only invoked at a single call-site. Here we inline them at their call-sites, which will unlock further simplifications of the code that will allow us to remove pointer mutations in favor of explicit expression oriented programming. We also delete the tests associated with these functions, the overall functionality is implicitly tested by the TestEvaluateHTLCView tests.
htlcswitch: add drive method to quiescer
htlcswitch: use quiescer drive method in link stfu implementation This commit amends the implementation presented in the last one by taking advantage of the quiescer drive method. This allows us to centralize quiescence logic better rather than diffusing it throughout the link. h/t @carlaKC
In this commit we defer processRemoteAdds using a new mechanism on the quiescer where we capture a closure that needs to be run. We do this because we need to avoid the scenario where we send back immediate resolutions to the newly added HTLCs when quiescent as it is a protocol violation. It is not enough for us to simply defer sending the messages since the purpose of quiescence itself is to have well-defined and agreed upon channel state. If, for whatever reason, the node (or connection) is restarted between when these hooks are captured and when they are ultimately run, they will be resolved by the resolveFwdPkgs logic when the link comes back up. In a future commit we will explicitly call the quiescer's resume method when it is OK for htlc traffic to commence.
In this commit we implement a noop quiescer that we will use when the feature hasn't been negotiated. This will make it far easier to manage quiescence operations without having a number of if statements in the link logic.
Here we add a flag where we can disable quiescence. This will be used in the case where the feature is not negotiated with our peer.
This commit takes the CommitChainEpochHistory defined in the last commit and adds it to the OpenChannel structure. As of this commit it is essentially redundant with the ChanCfgs but it will capture the history of the ChanCfgs when we add the ability to update them.
…each This commit changes the way we create breach retributions to use the CsvDelay we compute from the CommitChainEpochHistory so as to account for the possibility that the channel parameters have changed since opening.
ProofOfKeags
force-pushed
the
feature/dyncomm-negotiator
branch
from
48a377a
to
85e8f97
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change Description
THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Steps to Test
Steps for reviewers to follow to test the change.
Pull Request Checklist
Testing
Code Style and Documentation
[skip ci]in the commit message for small changes.📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.