Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sqldb+invoices: fix incorrectly stored invoice expiries when using native SQL #8855

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

bhandras
Copy link
Collaborator

@bhandras bhandras commented Jun 21, 2024

Previously, when using the native schema, invoice expiries were incorrectly stored as 64-bit values (expiry in nanoseconds instead of seconds), causing overflow issues. Since we cannot determine the original values, we will set the expiries for existing invoices to 1 hour with this migration.

Based on #8854 only the last 5 commits are part of this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bhandras bhandras added the database Related to the database/storage of LND label Jun 21, 2024
@bhandras bhandras self-assigned this Jun 21, 2024
@saubyk saubyk modified the milestones: 0.19.0, v0.18.1 Jun 21, 2024
@bhandras bhandras marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2024 14:07
@saubyk
Copy link
Collaborator

saubyk commented Jun 25, 2024

Since we cannot determine the original values

Question: Can you please elaborate on this? Is it because the precision will be lost when dividing the stored values by 1,000,000,000 to convert the nanoseconds into seconds?

@saubyk saubyk added the P1 MUST be fixed or reviewed label Jun 25, 2024
@bhandras
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Since we cannot determine the original values

Question: Can you please elaborate on this? Is it because the precision will be lost when dividing the stored values by 1,000,000,000 to convert the nanoseconds into seconds?

Since 64-bit nanosecond values are truncated to 32 bits, we lose 32 bits of information, making it impossible to accurately determine the original intended values. Please note that this issue only affects newly stored invoices and only impacts users who are using native SQL.

Comment on lines 1 to 5
-- Update the expiry to 3600 seconds (1 hour) for all records in the invoices
-- table. This is needed as previously we stored raw time.Duration values which
-- are 64 bit integers and are used to express duration in nanoseconds however
-- the intent is to store invoice expiry in seconds.
UPDATE invoices SET expiry = 3600;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🫡

sqldb/sqlite.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice - tACK - LGTM ✅

tested the following:

Before this PR:

  • Add invoice
  • see that expiry watcher uses correct expiry
  • but incorrect expiry persisted
  • on restart, invoice immediately expired & payer cannot pay

Transitioning to this PR:

  • on master, add the invoice.
  • restart LND with this PR
  • see that persisted expiry is 3600
  • invoice is loaded & payer can pay

My main comment is around potentially matching the default expiry that LND actually uses for new invoices though, which is 24 hrs, not 1 hr.

sqldb/migrations.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sqldb/sqlite.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sqldb/sqlite.go Show resolved Hide resolved
sqldb/sqlc/migrations/000004_invoice_expiry_fix.up.sql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bhandras bhandras force-pushed the invoice-expiry-migration branch 2 times, most recently from c0fb4df to afe3d2e Compare June 28, 2024 13:42
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bhandras bhandras left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the thorough review and insightful comments @ellemouton! Much appreciated :)

sqldb/sqlite.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sqldb/migrations.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sqldb/sqlc/migrations/000004_invoice_expiry_fix.up.sql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sqldb/sqlite.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@saubyk saubyk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 💾

@ellemouton
Copy link
Collaborator

@bhandras - just picked this up while going through some route blinding stuff: I see that for AMP invoices, our default is actually 30 days (instead of 24 hours like as for non-amp invoices). Is that potentially something we want to take into account?

@bhandras
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bhandras commented Jul 1, 2024

@bhandras - just picked this up while going through some route blinding stuff: I see that for AMP invoices, our default is actually 30 days (instead of 24 hours like as for non-amp invoices). Is that potentially something we want to take into account?

Good catch, thank you! Let me update the PR to also fix times for AMP invoices before we merge. Will re-req when done.

@bhandras
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bhandras commented Jul 2, 2024

List of changes since last round:

  • AMP invoices are migrated to 30d expiry
  • Fixed some issues with the postgres test helpers
  • Added coverage for AMP invoices as well as running the migration test for both sqlite and postgres
  • Switched from pq to pgx for consistency and because it is better maintained

Diff: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/compare/a50d8bd58bbc08bd0f75761315a6551a502664bc..b5661d6263cba46773971ccbf357dc70e7572460

PTAL :)

@bhandras bhandras force-pushed the invoice-expiry-migration branch 2 times, most recently from b5661d6 to eed34f8 Compare July 8, 2024 08:19
Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🚢

sqldb/migrations_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Previously, when using the native schema, invoice expiries were incorrectly
stored as 64-bit values (expiry in nanoseconds instead of seconds), causing
overflow issues. Since we cannot determine the original values, we will set
the expiries for existing invoices to 1 hour with this migration.
Completely switch to the better maintained pgx driver.
@guggero guggero merged commit a965535 into lightningnetwork:master Jul 9, 2024
30 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
database Related to the database/storage of LND migration P1 MUST be fixed or reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants