doc: delete llnode from diagnostic tooling support tiers
#43289
Conversation
|
Review requested:
|
tony-go
force-pushed
the
remove-llnode-tierlist
branch
from
0051d50
to
08d80cf
Compare
|
/cc @mmarchini |
|
cc @nodejs/llnode |
lpinca
dismissed
their stale review
I'm actually not sure if it makes sense to remove it.
|
@gireeshpunathil I believe you found a volunteer? |
|
Speaking as someone who used to do some maintenance work on llnode - I don’t think it’s now maintained enough to be considered supported, I do sometimes miss it when I need to grok V8 coredumps or certain kinds of crashed V8 processes, though sadly I don’t think I currently have the bandwidth to keep it in shape either.. |
Yes, but given the time to ramp up, I think it makes sense to take it off the list as of now, and add it back at a later point when we think it is sufficiently maintained? |
|
@tony-go can you please remove the merge commit? |
tony-go
force-pushed
the
remove-llnode-tierlist
branch
from
9bdb47e
to
17c8d24
Compare
|
cc @lpinca |
|
I would also be interested in contributing when I can as I use it regularly. I don't have much bandwidth so don't want to be the only person on it, but if there's any calls happening to get others up to speed, please invite me too. |
|
I also offer my help during the last WG meeting. Definitely not familiar with this kind of project, but it's surely a good opportunity to learn ^^ |
jasnell
added
the
commit-queue
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
|
Landed in 4f3b8fa |
PR-URL: #43289 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <adamzdanielle@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #43289 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <adamzdanielle@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #43289 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <adamzdanielle@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs/node#43289 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <adamzdanielle@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Hey node family 👋
Context
The diagnostic working group currently works on an initiative to re-evaluate the diagnostic tooling list and its maturity.
Updated
In the previous instance, we examined the case of the
llnodemodule: issue link.It seems that we don't have a clear idea about the current status of this tool. Until we can clarify the status of this tool, we prefer to remove it from the list.
In parallel, @gireeshpunathil will try to contact potential contributors to see how could we fill the gap.
Discuss
As usual, feel free to share your thoughts on that and your experience with this tool.
With love ❤️
cc @nodejs/diagnostics