- added AzurePipelinesPool as a abstraction for vmImage and on prem p… #1398
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I want to use nuke.build with our on-prem agents. Unfortunately, I didn't find a solution to pass a pool name to be considered in the final yml file.
I saw that other people also had a similar problem: #1173, #749.
My proposition is to create an additional abstraction, AzurePipelinesPool, which can be either a Microsoft-hosted agent (vmImage) or a self-hosted agent, as that is essentially what a pool is in Azure Pipelines.
Here is a proposal for the changes, and I am open to suggestions.
I also removed
images
parameters fromAzurePipelinesAttribute
because if you really need to run your targets on multiple vmImages, it's probably better to configure multipleAzurePipelinesAttribute
, am I right?I confirm that the pull-request: