Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

- added AzurePipelinesPool as a abstraction for vmImage and on prem p… #1398

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mateuszradny
Copy link

I want to use nuke.build with our on-prem agents. Unfortunately, I didn't find a solution to pass a pool name to be considered in the final yml file.

I saw that other people also had a similar problem: #1173, #749.

My proposition is to create an additional abstraction, AzurePipelinesPool, which can be either a Microsoft-hosted agent (vmImage) or a self-hosted agent, as that is essentially what a pool is in Azure Pipelines.

Here is a proposal for the changes, and I am open to suggestions.
I also removed images parameters from AzurePipelinesAttribute because if you really need to run your targets on multiple vmImages, it's probably better to configure multiple AzurePipelinesAttribute, am I right?

I confirm that the pull-request:

  • Follows the contribution guidelines
  • Is based on my own work
  • Is in compliance with my employer

@matkoch matkoch force-pushed the develop branch 2 times, most recently from e652c9a to 6ed9e4d Compare July 14, 2024 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants