-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: excluder: An R package that checks for exclusion criteria in online data #3889
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #3889 with the following error:
|
@whedon generate pdf from branch paper |
|
@whedon check references from branch paper |
|
|
👋 @mikldk - would you be able to edit this JOSS submission? |
@mikldk has been invited to edit this submission. |
@whedon assign me as editor |
OK, the editor is @mikldk |
@JeffreyRStevens - thank you for the submission. Do you have any suggestions for reviewers (here is a list of potential reviewers)? |
Thanks, @mikldk. The package has already been peer reviewed in rOpenSci by Joseph O'Brien (@jmobrien) and Julia Silge (@juliasilge) at ropensci/software-review#455. Is there a fast-track review option since it has already been peer reviewed? If so, do you still need additional reviewers? |
Yes, sorry, I was not aware of this when I asked @mikldk to edit. I'll take this back and run this through quickly, in the next day or few hopefully. |
@whedon assign me as editor |
OK, the editor is @danielskatz |
@danielskatz, OK--thanks. Note that the reviewers did not review the paper, just the package. |
right - that's typical - I will review the paper as part of the process |
@ehedon assign @danielskatz as reviewer |
@whedon assign @danielskatz as reviewer |
OK, @danielskatz is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #3893. |
Submitting author: @JeffreyRStevens (Jeffrey R Stevens)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/excluder/
Version: v0.3.1
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @danielskatz
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JeffreyRStevens. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@JeffreyRStevens if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: