Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix ignore header in MSVC test #108809

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 16, 2023
Merged

fix ignore header in MSVC test #108809

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

lqd
Copy link
Member

@lqd lqd commented Mar 6, 2023

From @pietroalbini's zulip message

there are tests like tests/ui/panic-runtime/unwind-tables-target-required.rs which have only-x86_64-windows-msvc which I'm pretty sure is invalid

This test is currently ignored on x64 MSVC CI because of this incorrect target. We'll see if it still passes.

r? @pietroalbini

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 6, 2023
Copy link
Member

@wesleywiser wesleywiser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me unless you really want Pietro to approve 🙂

@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Mar 6, 2023

Not necessarily, so thanks Wesley 🙏

We're not 100% sure the test will pass CI, so let's not roll it up unconditionally. It seems probable that it could succeed.

@bors r=wesleywiser rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 6, 2023

📌 Commit 3c8078a70f4cf4cf5bfa5239b363d1b4e59d8d20 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 6, 2023
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Heh my plan was to fix this when starting to validate ignore and only, thank you for proactively fixing it!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 12, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 3c8078a70f4cf4cf5bfa5239b363d1b4e59d8d20 with merge 33ba73e8ae57e467415899ce019d93d52760d517...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 12, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 12, 2023
@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Mar 13, 2023

test [ui] tests\ui\panic-runtime\unwind-tables-target-required.rs ... FAILED

The fact that this test fails (or has regressed) isn't a big problem thankfully: it's only testing CLI behavior. So I've fixed the test pattern and took care of the expectations (we don't really need to bless them here).

I'm quite confident it will pass on CI now, even rolled up.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment was marked as outdated.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 14, 2023

📌 Commit 956bebb has been approved by pietroalbini

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 15, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 956bebb with merge f63872b77943ce45144a81665bb9107134939eb3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 15, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 15, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-aux failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
error: process exited with code 101 (expected 0)
--- stdout

--- stderr
error: could not execute process `/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/tmp/cit/t2605/lib/./foo -vV` (never executed)
Caused by:
  Text file busy (os error 26)
', src/tools/cargo/tests/testsuite/workspaces.rs:2175:42

---
test result: FAILED. 2636 passed; 1 failed; 166 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 91.71s

error: test failed, to rerun pass `--test testsuite`
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:20:57
make: *** [Makefile:44: check-aux] Error 1

@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Mar 15, 2023

That looks unrelated, and probably spurious.

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 15, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 956bebb with merge bfcdf522a6d7d7cbf8cc26c8668ae56a13f95008...

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Mar 16, 2023

@bors retry

Yielding to #109183, which needs to be in the next nightly.

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 956bebb with merge cd6c574...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 16, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: pietroalbini
Pushing cd6c574 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 16, 2023
@bors bors merged commit cd6c574 into rust-lang:master Mar 16, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Mar 16, 2023
@lqd lqd deleted the fix-ignore branch March 16, 2023 11:08
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (cd6c574): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.0% [-1.3%, -0.9%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.1% [1.1%, 1.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.0% [-1.1%, 1.1%] 2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1

@lqd
Copy link
Member Author

lqd commented Mar 17, 2023

note for perf triage: tt-muncher is currently noisy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants