Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update anyhow #115024

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2023
Merged

update anyhow #115024

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2023

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

This is the anyhow version of #114944, fixing Miri builds with an existing x.py cache by including dtolnay/anyhow#320.

r? @lqd

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 20, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 20, 2023

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Aug 20, 2023

Ah great.
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 20, 2023

📌 Commit 83283a4 has been approved by lqd

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 20, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 20, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 83283a4 with merge b42b1d0384c92b04acae6ac2dabd97f1f40b6838...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 20, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Aug 20, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry Could not resolve host: ci-mirrors.rust-lang.org

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 20, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 20, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 83283a4 with merge def52ba...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 20, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lqd
Pushing def52ba to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 20, 2023
@bors bors merged commit def52ba into rust-lang:master Aug 20, 2023
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.73.0 milestone Aug 20, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (def52ba): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 636.195s -> 635.287s (-0.14%)
Artifact size: 346.98 MiB -> 346.95 MiB (-0.01%)

@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the anyhow branch August 21, 2023 05:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants