Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Directly add extension instead of using Path::with_extension #125406

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

tbu-
Copy link
Contributor

@tbu- tbu- commented May 22, 2024

Path::with_extension has a nice footgun when the original path doesn't contain an extension: Anything after the last dot gets removed.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 22, 2024

r? @Nadrieril

rustbot has assigned @Nadrieril.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 22, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@tbu- tbu- force-pushed the pr_rm_path_with_extension branch from 70d39cd to 87b77a2 Compare May 22, 2024 13:30
@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

Good spot!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 22, 2024

📌 Commit 87b77a2 has been approved by Nadrieril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 22, 2024
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
…Nadrieril

Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`

`Path::with_extension` has a nice footgun when the original path doesn't contain an extension: Anything after the last dot gets removed.
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
…Nadrieril

Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`

`Path::with_extension` has a nice footgun when the original path doesn't contain an extension: Anything after the last dot gets removed.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122665 (Add some tests for public-private dependencies.)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125316 (Tweak `Spacing` use)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125406 (Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122665 (Add some tests for public-private dependencies.)
 - rust-lang#125210 (Cleanup: Fix up some diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#125316 (Tweak `Spacing` use)
 - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`)
 - rust-lang#125406 (Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`)
 - rust-lang#125409 (Rename `FrameworkOnlyWindows` to `RawDylibOnlyWindows`)
 - rust-lang#125416 (Use correct param-env in `MissingCopyImplementations`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 23, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 87b77a2 with merge bba736a...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
…drieril

Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`

`Path::with_extension` has a nice footgun when the original path doesn't contain an extension: Anything after the last dot gets removed.
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 23, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 23, 2024
@tbu- tbu- force-pushed the pr_rm_path_with_extension branch from 87b77a2 to 0a3ecea Compare May 24, 2024 09:49
@tbu-
Copy link
Contributor Author

tbu- commented May 24, 2024

Anything after the last dot gets removed.

Interesting. This was apparently already hit by the existing code, because the added suffix just got dropped entirely. ^^

@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

Do you think that might have been intentional?

@tbu-
Copy link
Contributor Author

tbu- commented May 24, 2024

Do you think that might have been intentional?

I don't think so. There's no point in adding a suffix that is immediately removed again. The name_suffix was purely dead code.

@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

Alright, let's try again

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 29, 2024

📌 Commit 0a3ecea has been approved by Nadrieril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 29, 2024
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 29, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 29, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 0a3ecea with merge f839e1d...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
…drieril

Directly add extension instead of using `Path::with_extension`

`Path::with_extension` has a nice footgun when the original path doesn't contain an extension: Anything after the last dot gets removed.
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 29, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 29, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 30, 2024

sync @bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 30, 2024
@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

The test failure is due to formatting, I'm surprised that tidy didn't catch it. Anyway, please run rustfmt and we should be good

`Path::with_extension` has a nice footgun when the original path doesn't
contain an extension: Anything after the last dot gets removed.
@tbu- tbu- force-pushed the pr_rm_path_with_extension branch from 0a3ecea to f7c51a2 Compare June 4, 2024 20:12
@tbu-
Copy link
Contributor Author

tbu- commented Jun 4, 2024

Autoformatted.

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 4, 2024
@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2024

📌 Commit f7c51a2 has been approved by Nadrieril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 5, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2024

⌛ Testing commit f7c51a2 with merge 67caf52...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 6, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nadrieril
Pushing 67caf52 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 6, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 67caf52 into rust-lang:master Jun 6, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Jun 6, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (67caf52): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 3.6%, secondary 4.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.6% [3.6%, 3.6%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.4% [4.4%, 4.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.6% [3.6%, 3.6%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 672.761s -> 670.655s (-0.31%)
Artifact size: 319.40 MiB -> 319.39 MiB (-0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants