Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2 #129687

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

Urgau
Copy link
Member

@Urgau Urgau commented Aug 28, 2024

This PR is a continuation of #118149. Nothing really changed, except for #129408 which I was able to trigger locally.

Original description:

Implement parts of #111540

Right now, backtraces into sysroot always shows /rustc/$hash in diagnostics, e.g.

thread 'main' panicked at 'hello world', map-panic.rs:2:50
stack backtrace:
   0: std::panicking::begin_panic
             at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/std/src/panicking.rs:616:12
   1: map_panic::main::{{closure}}
             at ./map-panic.rs:2:50
   2: core::option::Option<T>::map
             at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/option.rs:929:29
   3: map_panic::main
             at ./map-panic.rs:2:30
   4: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
             at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.

RFC 3127 said

We want to change this behaviour such that, when rust-src source files can be discovered, the virtual path is discarded and therefore the local path will be embedded, unless there is a --remap-path-prefix that causes this local path to be remapped in the usual way.

This PR implements this behaviour. When rust-src is present at compile time, rustc replaces /rustc/$hash with a real path into local rust-src with best effort. To sanitise this, users must explicitly supply --remap-path-prefix=<path to rust-src>=foo.

cc @cbeuw
Fix #105907
Fix #85463

try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 28, 2024
@Urgau
Copy link
Member Author

Urgau commented Aug 28, 2024

@bors try

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2024
Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2

Continuation of rust-lang#118149

*Draft for the time being, to figure out if the previous issues have been fixed.*
r? ghost

try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 28, 2024

⌛ Trying commit cac4a30 with merge a600fe8...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 28, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: a600fe8 (a600fe8b275a62c2973e9fc1b589e50302eb2540)

@Urgau
Copy link
Member Author

Urgau commented Aug 29, 2024

Great, the extended try is successful! dist-x86_64-linux and x86_64-msvc were the builder that failed in the previous PR: #118149 (comment).

I've verified locally (with rustup-toolchain-install-master):

  1. that the prebuild rlibs only contains /rustc/ paths ✔
  2. that compiling tests/codegen/remap_path_prefix/issue-73167-remap-std.rs without the rust-src component only leads to /rustc/ paths ✔
  3. that compiling tests/codegen/remap_path_prefix/issue-73167-remap-std.rs with the rust-src component leads to many (not all) paths redirected to /home/gh-Urgau/.rustup/toolchains/a600fe8b275a62c2973e9fc1b589e50302eb2540/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/

Everything looks go.
r? compiler

@Urgau Urgau marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2024 09:54
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 29, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest

cc @jieyouxu

@Urgau Urgau added the F-trim-paths Feature: trim-paths label Aug 29, 2024
@jieyouxu jieyouxu assigned jieyouxu and unassigned fmease Sep 20, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, the changes themselves look good to me. We definitely should update rustc-dev-guide to mention existence and purpose of {{rust-src-base}}, would be very cool if you can open a follow-up dev-guide PR.

Comment on lines +1663 to +1651
const STD_LIBS: &[&str] = &[
"core",
"alloc",
"std",
"test",
"term",
"unwind",
"proc_macro",
"panic_abort",
"panic_unwind",
"profiler_builtins",
"rtstartup",
"rustc-std-workspace-core",
"rustc-std-workspace-alloc",
"rustc-std-workspace-std",
"backtrace",
];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remark: I think this is fine, though it might be interesting if stdlib ever adds/removes/renames specific crates. I also can't immediately think of a good way to add a test to make sure this list is always in sync.

@@ -1115,6 +1115,7 @@ fn expand_variables(mut value: String, config: &Config) -> String {
const CWD: &str = "{{cwd}}";
const SRC_BASE: &str = "{{src-base}}";
const BUILD_BASE: &str = "{{build-base}}";
const RUST_SRC_BASE: &str = "{{rust-src-base}}";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: we definitely want to update rustc-dev-guide's compiletest directive remarks to mention {{rust-src-base}}, which is not to be confused with {{src-base}}.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 25, 2024

📌 Commit cac4a30 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 25, 2024
@jieyouxu

This comment was marked as resolved.

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2

This PR is a continuation of rust-lang#118149. Nothing really changed, except for rust-lang#129408 which I was able to trigger locally.

Original description:

> Implement parts of rust-lang#111540
>
> Right now, backtraces into sysroot always shows /rustc/$hash in diagnostics, e.g.
>
> ```
> thread 'main' panicked at 'hello world', map-panic.rs:2:50
> stack backtrace:
>    0: std::panicking::begin_panic
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/std/src/panicking.rs:616:12
>    1: map_panic::main::{{closure}}
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:50
>    2: core::option::Option<T>::map
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/option.rs:929:29
>    3: map_panic::main
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:30
>    4: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
> note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
> ```
>
> [RFC 3127 said](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3127-trim-paths.html#changing-handling-of-sysroot-path-in-rustc)
>
> > We want to change this behaviour such that, when rust-src source files can be discovered, the virtual path is discarded and therefore the local path will be embedded, unless there is a --remap-path-prefix that causes this local path to be remapped in the usual way.
>
> This PR implements this behaviour. When `rust-src` is present at compile time, rustc replaces /rustc/$hash with a real path into local rust-src with best effort. To sanitise this, users must explicitly supply `--remap-path-prefix=<path to rust-src>=foo`.

cc `@cbeuw`
Fix rust-lang#105907
Fix rust-lang#85463

try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129687 (Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2)
 - rust-lang#129759 (Stabilize `const_refs_to_static`)
 - rust-lang#130329 (Reorder stack spills so that constants come later.)
 - rust-lang#130845 (Utf8Chunks: add link to Utf8Chunk)
 - rust-lang#130846 (Revert Break into the debugger on panic (129019))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2

This PR is a continuation of rust-lang#118149. Nothing really changed, except for rust-lang#129408 which I was able to trigger locally.

Original description:

> Implement parts of rust-lang#111540
>
> Right now, backtraces into sysroot always shows /rustc/$hash in diagnostics, e.g.
>
> ```
> thread 'main' panicked at 'hello world', map-panic.rs:2:50
> stack backtrace:
>    0: std::panicking::begin_panic
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/std/src/panicking.rs:616:12
>    1: map_panic::main::{{closure}}
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:50
>    2: core::option::Option<T>::map
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/option.rs:929:29
>    3: map_panic::main
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:30
>    4: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
> note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
> ```
>
> [RFC 3127 said](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3127-trim-paths.html#changing-handling-of-sysroot-path-in-rustc)
>
> > We want to change this behaviour such that, when rust-src source files can be discovered, the virtual path is discarded and therefore the local path will be embedded, unless there is a --remap-path-prefix that causes this local path to be remapped in the usual way.
>
> This PR implements this behaviour. When `rust-src` is present at compile time, rustc replaces /rustc/$hash with a real path into local rust-src with best effort. To sanitise this, users must explicitly supply `--remap-path-prefix=<path to rust-src>=foo`.

cc ``@cbeuw``
Fix rust-lang#105907
Fix rust-lang#85463

try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129687 (Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2)
 - rust-lang#130820 (Fix diagnostics for coroutines with () as input.)
 - rust-lang#130833 (Fix the misleading diagnostic for `let_underscore_drop` on type without `Drop` implementation)
 - rust-lang#130845 (Utf8Chunks: add link to Utf8Chunk)
 - rust-lang#130868 (Update FIXME comment in s390x_unknown_linux_*.rs)
 - rust-lang#130873 (rustc_target: Add powerpc64 atomic-related features)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#129687 (Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2)
 - rust-lang#130820 (Fix diagnostics for coroutines with () as input.)
 - rust-lang#130833 (Fix the misleading diagnostic for `let_underscore_drop` on type without `Drop` implementation)
 - rust-lang#130845 (Utf8Chunks: add link to Utf8Chunk)
 - rust-lang#130868 (Update FIXME comment in s390x_unknown_linux_*.rs)
 - rust-lang#130873 (rustc_target: Add powerpc64 atomic-related features)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2

This PR is a continuation of rust-lang#118149. Nothing really changed, except for rust-lang#129408 which I was able to trigger locally.

Original description:

> Implement parts of rust-lang#111540
>
> Right now, backtraces into sysroot always shows /rustc/$hash in diagnostics, e.g.
>
> ```
> thread 'main' panicked at 'hello world', map-panic.rs:2:50
> stack backtrace:
>    0: std::panicking::begin_panic
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/std/src/panicking.rs:616:12
>    1: map_panic::main::{{closure}}
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:50
>    2: core::option::Option<T>::map
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/option.rs:929:29
>    3: map_panic::main
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:30
>    4: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
> note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
> ```
>
> [RFC 3127 said](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3127-trim-paths.html#changing-handling-of-sysroot-path-in-rustc)
>
> > We want to change this behaviour such that, when rust-src source files can be discovered, the virtual path is discarded and therefore the local path will be embedded, unless there is a --remap-path-prefix that causes this local path to be remapped in the usual way.
>
> This PR implements this behaviour. When `rust-src` is present at compile time, rustc replaces /rustc/$hash with a real path into local rust-src with best effort. To sanitise this, users must explicitly supply `--remap-path-prefix=<path to rust-src>=foo`.

cc ```@cbeuw```
Fix rust-lang#105907
Fix rust-lang#85463

try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

📌 Commit 61ef983 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 27, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 61ef983 with merge cde36fb...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
Implement RFC3137 trim-paths sysroot changes - take 2

This PR is a continuation of rust-lang#118149. Nothing really changed, except for rust-lang#129408 which I was able to trigger locally.

Original description:

> Implement parts of rust-lang#111540
>
> Right now, backtraces into sysroot always shows /rustc/$hash in diagnostics, e.g.
>
> ```
> thread 'main' panicked at 'hello world', map-panic.rs:2:50
> stack backtrace:
>    0: std::panicking::begin_panic
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/std/src/panicking.rs:616:12
>    1: map_panic::main::{{closure}}
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:50
>    2: core::option::Option<T>::map
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/option.rs:929:29
>    3: map_panic::main
>              at ./map-panic.rs:2:30
>    4: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
>              at /rustc/a55dd71d5fb0ec5a6a3a9e8c27b2127ba491ce52/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
> note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
> ```
>
> [RFC 3127 said](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3127-trim-paths.html#changing-handling-of-sysroot-path-in-rustc)
>
> > We want to change this behaviour such that, when rust-src source files can be discovered, the virtual path is discarded and therefore the local path will be embedded, unless there is a --remap-path-prefix that causes this local path to be remapped in the usual way.
>
> This PR implements this behaviour. When `rust-src` is present at compile time, rustc replaces /rustc/$hash with a real path into local rust-src with best effort. To sanitise this, users must explicitly supply `--remap-path-prefix=<path to rust-src>=foo`.

cc `@cbeuw`
Fix rust-lang#105907
Fix rust-lang#85463

try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc
try-job: armhf-gnu
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 27, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

I'm not exactly sure why opt-dist sysroot path prefixes becomes wonky...

I suspect we may need to modify opt-dist to pass some information to bootstrap -> compiletest to possibly repair the path prefix up to something like unpacked-dist/rustc-nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rustc/lib/rustlib/src/rust, but I haven't dug deeply into this yet.

We wouldn't want to skip these tests naively especially if it can possibly reveal bugs in PGO+LTO among other things.

in case the real paths into the libstd/libcore are located inside the
the build directory, maybe because it's coming from an extracted dist
component in the build dir (cc opt-dist)
This is done to cover the path of the test it-self as it may not live
on the same root directory as {{rust-src-base}}, which can be the case
if {{rust-src-base}} is coming from a extracted dist build (cc opt-dist)
@rustbot rustbot added the T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 28, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

If the opt-dist tests steps never get reached in PR CI or try-jobs, let's rollup=never and send it off for full CI. r=me once you drop the CI commit.

@bors rollup=never (expected to fail)

@Urgau Urgau removed the T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 28, 2024
@Urgau
Copy link
Member Author

Urgau commented Sep 28, 2024

@bors r=@jieyouxu

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2024

📌 Commit 3a6c6ee has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 28, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 29, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 3a6c6ee with merge 1d9162b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 29, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing 1d9162b to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 29, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 1d9162b into rust-lang:master Sep 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 29, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1d9162b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.7% [0.2%, 1.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.8%, secondary -0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.5% [2.2%, 6.6%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-4.0%, -1.4%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.8% [2.8%, 2.8%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

Results (primary 0.2%, secondary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.2% [0.0%, 1.4%] 71
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.0%, 0.2%] 18
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.2% [0.0%, 1.4%] 71

Bootstrap: 768.272s -> 768.678s (0.05%)
Artifact size: 341.40 MiB -> 341.38 MiB (-0.01%)

@Urgau Urgau added relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. and removed T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Sep 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc F-trim-paths Feature: trim-paths merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

/rustc/$hash prefix is not being mapped when expected remap libstd paths in backtraces for test crates
9 participants