Use &raw in the standard library

[cuviper]

Since the stabilization in #127679 has reached stage0, 1.82-beta, we can
start using &raw freely, and even the soft-deprecated ptr::addr_of!
and ptr::addr_of_mut! can stop allowing the unstable feature.

I intentionally did not change any documentation or tests, but the rest
of those macro uses are all now using &raw const or &raw mut in the
standard library.

[rustbot]

r? @tgross35

rustbot has assigned @tgross35.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[tgross35]

Huh I didn't realize these were soft deprecated, but it is documented that way. Makes sense to do this then, everything here is just a straightforward replacement.

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit f4d9d1a has been approved by tgross35

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f4d9d1a with merge f2becdf...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: tgross35
Pushing f2becdf to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (f2becdf): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.3%, 0.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.1%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.3%, 0.5%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-2.5%, -1.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-2.5%, -1.2%]	2

Cycles

Results (primary 3.2%, secondary 3.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.2%	[1.2%, 11.1%]	12
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.3%	[3.3%, 3.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.2%	[1.2%, 11.1%]	12

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 772.716s -> 773.662s (0.12%)
Artifact size: 340.95 MiB -> 340.89 MiB (-0.02%)