Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 5 pull requests #40160

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

MajorBreakfast and others added 10 commits February 28, 2017 10:58
This contains two important bugfixes
I made these the same order as they were in the compiler, but for no good reason. Much easier to find out what you need when they're sorted alphabetically
Structs doc: Change "pointers" to "references"

Let's call them "references" instead of "pointers". That's how they're called in chapter 4.9 "References and Borrowing".

r? @steveklabnik
Unit-like structs doc: Improve code sample

r? @steveklabnik

BTW it seems that
```Rust
let p = Proton {};
```
compiles without an error. That's why I didn't add it to the example. It's about consistency anyway.
…arget-has-atomic, r=alexcrichton

Add compile test for cfg_target_has_atomic

Issue rust-lang#39059.
I am concerned about whether the test is excessive.
update mdbook version

This contains two important bugfixes
…ook, r=frewsxcv

sort unstable book alphabetically

I made these the same order as they were in the compiler, but for no good reason. Much easier to find out what you need when they're sorted alphabetically

r? @frewsxcv
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

@steveklabnik: no appropriate reviewer found, use r? to override

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=100

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

📌 Commit adb5183 has been approved by steveklabnik

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit adb5183 with merge 11db62c...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2017
Rollup of 5 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40142, #40144, #40150, #40151, #40153
- Failed merges:
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants