"use of unstable library feature 'restricted_std'" can't be fixed for deps #69
Labels
S-needs-investigation
Status: needs investigation
Comments
|
Do you have any thoughts on how that could be accomplished? It seems like it would be quite difficult without some compiler magic. This is very much in the experimental phase, so it is somewhat expected that you'll need to patch things to try it out. For serde specifically, you can build without default features if there isn't anything in particular you need from std. |
|
@ehuss I feel like another |
|
I ran into the same problem like |
|
Any fixes for this issue? |
|
This is causing problems with miri, as well: |
fmease
pushed a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
This PR aims to pin down exactly what restricted_std is meant to achieve and what it isn't. This commit fixes rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#87 by explaining why the error appears and what the choices the user has. The error describes how std cannot function without knowing about some form of OS/platform support. Any features of std that work without an OS should be moved to core/alloc (see rust-lang#27242 rust-lang#103765). Note that the message says "platform" and "environment" because, since rust-lang#120232, libstd can be built for some JSON targets. This is still unsupported (all JSON targets probably should be unstable rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#90), but a JSON target with the right configuration should hopefully have some partial libstd support. I propose closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 as "Won't fix" since any support of std without properly configured os, vendor or env fields is very fragile considering future upgrades of Rust or dependencies. In addition there's no likely path to it being fixed long term (making std buildable for all targets being the only solution). This is distinct from tier 3 platforms with limited std support implemented (and as such aren't restricted_std) because these platforms can conceptually work in the future and std support should mainly improve over time. The alternative to closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 is a new crate feature for std which escapes the restricted_std mechanism in build.rs. It could be used with the -Zbuild-std-features flag if we keep it permanently unstable, which I hope we can do anyway. A minor side-effect in this scenario is that std wouldn't be marked as unstable if documentation for it were generated with build-std.
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…d-std, r=ehuss Document restricted_std This PR aims to pin down exactly what restricted_std is meant to achieve and what it isn't. This commit fixes rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#87 by explaining why the error appears and what the choices the user has. The error describes how std cannot function without knowing about some form of OS/platform support. Any features of std that work without an OS should be moved to core/alloc (see rust-lang#27242 rust-lang#103765). Note that the message says "platform" and "environment" because, since rust-lang#120232, libstd can be built for some JSON targets. This is still unsupported (all JSON targets probably should be unstable rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#90), but a JSON target with the right configuration should hopefully have some partial libstd support. I propose closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 as "Won't fix" since any support of std without properly configured os, vendor or env fields is very fragile considering future upgrades of Rust or dependencies. In addition there's no likely path to it being fixed long term (making std buildable for all targets being the only solution). This is distinct from tier 3 platforms with limited std support implemented (and as such aren't restricted_std) because these platforms can conceptually work in the future and std support should mainly improve over time. The alternative to closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 is a new crate feature for std which escapes the restricted_std mechanism in build.rs. It could be used with the -Zbuild-std-features flag if we keep it permanently unstable, which I hope we can do anyway. A minor side-effect in this scenario is that std wouldn't be marked as unstable if documentation for it were generated with build-std. cc `@ehuss`
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…d-std, r=ehuss Document restricted_std This PR aims to pin down exactly what restricted_std is meant to achieve and what it isn't. This commit fixes rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#87 by explaining why the error appears and what the choices the user has. The error describes how std cannot function without knowing about some form of OS/platform support. Any features of std that work without an OS should be moved to core/alloc (see rust-lang#27242 rust-lang#103765). Note that the message says "platform" and "environment" because, since rust-lang#120232, libstd can be built for some JSON targets. This is still unsupported (all JSON targets probably should be unstable rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#90), but a JSON target with the right configuration should hopefully have some partial libstd support. I propose closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 as "Won't fix" since any support of std without properly configured os, vendor or env fields is very fragile considering future upgrades of Rust or dependencies. In addition there's no likely path to it being fixed long term (making std buildable for all targets being the only solution). This is distinct from tier 3 platforms with limited std support implemented (and as such aren't restricted_std) because these platforms can conceptually work in the future and std support should mainly improve over time. The alternative to closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 is a new crate feature for std which escapes the restricted_std mechanism in build.rs. It could be used with the -Zbuild-std-features flag if we keep it permanently unstable, which I hope we can do anyway. A minor side-effect in this scenario is that std wouldn't be marked as unstable if documentation for it were generated with build-std. cc ``@ehuss``
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 10, 2024
…d-std, r=ehuss Document restricted_std This PR aims to pin down exactly what restricted_std is meant to achieve and what it isn't. This commit fixes rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#87 by explaining why the error appears and what the choices the user has. The error describes how std cannot function without knowing about some form of OS/platform support. Any features of std that work without an OS should be moved to core/alloc (see rust-lang#27242 rust-lang#103765). Note that the message says "platform" and "environment" because, since rust-lang#120232, libstd can be built for some JSON targets. This is still unsupported (all JSON targets probably should be unstable rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#90), but a JSON target with the right configuration should hopefully have some partial libstd support. I propose closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 as "Won't fix" since any support of std without properly configured os, vendor or env fields is very fragile considering future upgrades of Rust or dependencies. In addition there's no likely path to it being fixed long term (making std buildable for all targets being the only solution). This is distinct from tier 3 platforms with limited std support implemented (and as such aren't restricted_std) because these platforms can conceptually work in the future and std support should mainly improve over time. The alternative to closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 is a new crate feature for std which escapes the restricted_std mechanism in build.rs. It could be used with the -Zbuild-std-features flag if we keep it permanently unstable, which I hope we can do anyway. A minor side-effect in this scenario is that std wouldn't be marked as unstable if documentation for it were generated with build-std. cc ```@ehuss```
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123360 - adamgemmell:dev/adagem01/restricted-std, r=ehuss Document restricted_std This PR aims to pin down exactly what restricted_std is meant to achieve and what it isn't. This commit fixes rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#87 by explaining why the error appears and what the choices the user has. The error describes how std cannot function without knowing about some form of OS/platform support. Any features of std that work without an OS should be moved to core/alloc (see rust-lang#27242 rust-lang#103765). Note that the message says "platform" and "environment" because, since rust-lang#120232, libstd can be built for some JSON targets. This is still unsupported (all JSON targets probably should be unstable rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#90), but a JSON target with the right configuration should hopefully have some partial libstd support. I propose closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 as "Won't fix" since any support of std without properly configured os, vendor or env fields is very fragile considering future upgrades of Rust or dependencies. In addition there's no likely path to it being fixed long term (making std buildable for all targets being the only solution). This is distinct from tier 3 platforms with limited std support implemented (and as such aren't restricted_std) because these platforms can conceptually work in the future and std support should mainly improve over time. The alternative to closing rust-lang/wg-cargo-std-aware#69 is a new crate feature for std which escapes the restricted_std mechanism in build.rs. It could be used with the -Zbuild-std-features flag if we keep it permanently unstable, which I hope we can do anyway. A minor side-effect in this scenario is that std wouldn't be marked as unstable if documentation for it were generated with build-std. cc ```@ehuss```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm trying to build code with dependencies for
thumbv7m-none-eabi, and crates like serde fail due to the lack ofrestricted_std.This makes sense, but there doesn't seem to be a way to globally disable it, so either I have to edit and patch each of my dependencies, or I have to edit the requirement out of
std. Neither is good. It would be nice if there were a way to globally opt in to this.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: