Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 20, 2022. It is now read-only.

Feature/add pruning support #435

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 6, 2014
Merged

Conversation

ianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

@ianoc ianoc commented Feb 6, 2014

Separates out the add pruning, based ontop of the previous refactor. Adds in the proxy batched store also and a test of the pruning. (The much simpler one of the frozen + filter)

object Store extends java.io.Serializable {
// This could be moved to scalding, but the API needs more design work
// This DOES NOT trigger a grouping
def mapsideReduce[K,V](pipe: TypedPipe[(K, V)])(implicit sg: Semigroup[V]): TypedPipe[(K, V)] = {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ianoc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ianoc commented Feb 6, 2014

Updated this with a merge of latest develop to clean up the diff

@johnynek
Copy link
Collaborator

johnynek commented Feb 6, 2014

lgtm. Will merge when green.

jcoveney added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2014
@jcoveney jcoveney merged commit e67e648 into develop Feb 6, 2014
@ianoc ianoc deleted the feature/add_pruning_support branch February 6, 2014 23:44
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants