Cleanup unused labels in messages.ftl

[chenyukang]

These labels were not used, maybe because we removed the diagnostics but forgot them.

[rustbot]

r? @cjgillot

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[fmease]

I've just opened #115744 which among other things makes E0401 (generic params from outer item) fully translatable (i.e., including the labels) contrary to this PR. Sorry, I didn't see this PR until a moment ago 😅

[bors]

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #115758) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

[chenyukang]

I've just opened #115744 which among other things makes E0401 (generic params from outer item) fully translatable (i.e., including the labels) contrary to this PR. Sorry, I didn't see this PR until a moment ago 😅

never mind, I just rebased to master.

[cjgillot]

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit f9a9ff2 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bjorn3]

Can we have a tidy lint for this?

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f9a9ff2 with merge 53616b7...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job test-various failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

  Downloaded r-efi v4.2.0
   Compiling r-efi v4.2.0
   Compiling uefi_qemu_test v0.0.0 (/tmp/tmpg7buy8vh/uefi_qemu_test)
    Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1.28s
/tmp/tmpg7buy8vh/uefi_qemu_test/target/aarch64-unknown-uefi/debug/uefi_qemu_test.efi /tmp/tmpg7buy8vh/uefi_qemu_test/esp/efi/boot/bootaa64.efi
qemu-system-aarch64 -machine virt -cpu cortex-a72 -display none -serial stdio -drive if=pflash,format=raw,readonly=on,file=/usr/share/AAVMF/AAVMF_CODE.fd -drive if=pflash,format=raw,readonly=off,file=/tmp/tmpg7buy8vh/vars.fd -drive format=raw,file=fat:rw:/tmp/tmpg7buy8vh/uefi_qemu_test/esp
cargo build --manifest-path /tmp/tmp2h0t4qoz/uefi_qemu_test/Cargo.toml --target i686-unknown-uefi
    Updating crates.io index
warning: spurious network error (3 tries remaining): [7] Couldn't connect to server (Failed to connect to index.crates.io port 443 after 8243 ms: Couldn't connect to server)
warning: spurious network error (2 tries remaining): [7] Couldn't connect to server (Failed to connect to index.crates.io port 443 after 8186 ms: Couldn't connect to server)
warning: spurious network error (2 tries remaining): [7] Couldn't connect to server (Failed to connect to index.crates.io port 443 after 8186 ms: Couldn't connect to server)
warning: spurious network error (1 tries remaining): [7] Couldn't connect to server (Failed to connect to index.crates.io port 443 after 8179 ms: Couldn't connect to server)
error: failed to get `r-efi` as a dependency of package `uefi_qemu_test v0.0.0 (/tmp/tmp2h0t4qoz/uefi_qemu_test)`
Caused by:
  failed to query replaced source registry `crates-io`

Caused by:
---

Caused by:
  [7] Couldn't connect to server (Failed to connect to index.crates.io port 443 after 8187 ms: Couldn't connect to server)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/uefi_qemu_test/run.py", line 137, in <module>
    main()
  File "/uefi_qemu_test/run.py", line 133, in main
    build_and_run(tmp_dir, target)
  File "/uefi_qemu_test/run.py", line 68, in build_and_run
    run('cargo',
  File "/uefi_qemu_test/run.py", line 19, in run
    return subprocess.run(cmd,
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/subprocess.py", line 526, in run
    raise CalledProcessError(retcode, process.args,
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['cargo', 'build', '--manifest-path', '/tmp/tmp2h0t4qoz/uefi_qemu_test/Cargo.toml', '--target', 'i686-unknown-uefi']' returned non-zero exit status 101.
  network time: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:22:32 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[cjgillot]

@bors retry

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit f9a9ff2 with merge 5f6ee65...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing 5f6ee65 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (5f6ee65): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.9%	[0.9%, 1.0%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-3.4%, -1.0%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.2%	[-3.2%, -3.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.2%	[-3.4%, -1.0%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 632.792s -> 630.886s (-0.30%)
Artifact size: 317.95 MiB -> 317.92 MiB (-0.01%)