add -Z pre-link-arg{,s} to rustc #41971
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
Looks like this has a merge conflict. |
Mark-Simulacrum
added
the
S-waiting-on-author
This commit adds two unstable flags to `rustc`: `-Z pre-link-arg` and `-Z
pre-link-args`. These are the counterpart of the existing `-C link-arg{,s}`
flags and can be used to pass extra arguments at the *beginning* of the linker
invocation, before the Rust object files are passed.
|
@Mark-Simulacrum fixed |
Mark-Simulacrum
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Ping @alexcrichton for review. |
|
@bors: r+ Oop sorry for the delay! |
|
📌 Commit 94d2c43 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2017
add -Z pre-link-arg{,s} to rustc
This PR adds two unstable flags to `rustc`: `-Z pre-link-arg` and `-Z
pre-link-args`. These are the counterpart of the existing `-C link-arg{,s}`
flags and can be used to pass extra arguments at the *beginning* of the linker
invocation, before the Rust object files are passed.
I have [started] a discussion on the rust-embedded RFCs repo about settling on a
convention for passing extra arguments to the linker and there are two options
on discussion: `.cargo/config`'s `target.$T.rustflags` and custom target
specification files (`{pre,,post}-link-args` fields). However, to compare these
two options on equal footing this `-Z pre-link-arg` feature is required.
[started]: rust-embedded/wg#24
Therefore I'm requesting landing this `-Z pre-link-arg` flag as an experimental
feature to evaluate these two options.
cc @brson
r? @alexcrichton
|
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
|
@bors: retry something tells me that libstd doesn't actually take an hour to compile |
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2017
add -Z pre-link-arg{,s} to rustc
This PR adds two unstable flags to `rustc`: `-Z pre-link-arg` and `-Z
pre-link-args`. These are the counterpart of the existing `-C link-arg{,s}`
flags and can be used to pass extra arguments at the *beginning* of the linker
invocation, before the Rust object files are passed.
I have [started] a discussion on the rust-embedded RFCs repo about settling on a
convention for passing extra arguments to the linker and there are two options
on discussion: `.cargo/config`'s `target.$T.rustflags` and custom target
specification files (`{pre,,post}-link-args` fields). However, to compare these
two options on equal footing this `-Z pre-link-arg` feature is required.
[started]: rust-embedded/wg#24
Therefore I'm requesting landing this `-Z pre-link-arg` flag as an experimental
feature to evaluate these two options.
cc @brson
r? @alexcrichton
|
⌛ Testing commit 94d2c43 with merge 6ba3b15... |
|
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2017
add -Z pre-link-arg{,s} to rustc
This PR adds two unstable flags to `rustc`: `-Z pre-link-arg` and `-Z
pre-link-args`. These are the counterpart of the existing `-C link-arg{,s}`
flags and can be used to pass extra arguments at the *beginning* of the linker
invocation, before the Rust object files are passed.
I have [started] a discussion on the rust-embedded RFCs repo about settling on a
convention for passing extra arguments to the linker and there are two options
on discussion: `.cargo/config`'s `target.$T.rustflags` and custom target
specification files (`{pre,,post}-link-args` fields). However, to compare these
two options on equal footing this `-Z pre-link-arg` feature is required.
[started]: rust-embedded/wg#24
Therefore I'm requesting landing this `-Z pre-link-arg` flag as an experimental
feature to evaluate these two options.
cc @brson
r? @alexcrichton
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds two unstable flags to
rustc:-Z pre-link-argand-Z pre-link-args. These are the counterpart of the existing-C link-arg{,s}flags and can be used to pass extra arguments at the beginning of the linker
invocation, before the Rust object files are passed.
I have started a discussion on the rust-embedded RFCs repo about settling on a
convention for passing extra arguments to the linker and there are two options
on discussion:
.cargo/config'starget.$T.rustflagsand custom targetspecification files (
{pre,,post}-link-argsfields). However, to compare thesetwo options on equal footing this
-Z pre-link-argfeature is required.Therefore I'm requesting landing this
-Z pre-link-argflag as an experimentalfeature to evaluate these two options.
cc @brson
r? @alexcrichton